“It Didn’t Follow the Rule of Thirds”

I remember sitting in a meeting around 2016 or 2017, looking at someone’s photo when another person said, “It didn’t follow the rule of thirds.”

I was put off by that statement.

Not because the rule of thirds is useless—it can absolutely be helpful—but because the comment dismissed the photo based on a guideline, without considering the image itself. No thought was given to why the photo worked (or didn’t), what the photographer was trying to communicate, or what made the image compelling—or not.

That moment stuck with me.

Since then, I’ve found myself moving away from rules of composition and toward questions. Questions help us dig deeper than surface-level analysis. They keep us curious.

Instead of checking a mental list of “rules,” I ask:

What makes this photo effective?

What emotion does it convey?

What draws your attention in the frame?

How might breaking a rule add to the image?

These questions encourage reflection, not just obedience. And that’s where real creative growth happens.

Rules can be tools. But when they become rigid, they limit more than they help.

---

Would you like to add a visual example to go with it—maybe one of your own photos that breaks the rule but still works?

Don’t Just Give Settings—Ask Better Questions

Newer photographers often ask, “What settings should I use?” It’s a natural question, especially when they’re faced with unfamiliar situations or trying to improve quickly. And more often than not, an instructor or experienced photographer will respond with settings based on their own experience.

But I believe that short-circuits the learning process.

When we jump straight to handing out settings, we unintentionally rob learners of the opportunity to think through the situation for themselves. A more effective—and more lasting—approach is to ask thoughtful, guiding questions instead.

Questions like:

What are you photographing?

Why are you taking the photo?

What do you want the photo to emphasize?

What camera and lens are you using?

These questions help the photographer slow down and think. They prompt a deeper understanding of the creative and technical decisions behind every image.

Some of the answers may seem obvious—or assumed—by the instructor. But that’s the problem. Those assumptions can get in the way of helping someone truly understand their own process and gear.

By asking better questions, we help photographers connect the dots between their intent, their knowledge, and their tools. And that’s where real learning happens.

Newer photographers often ask, “What settings should I use?” It’s a natural question, especially when they’re faced with unfamiliar situations or trying to improve quickly. And more often than not, an instructor or experienced photographer will respond with settings based on their own experience.

But I believe that short-circuits the learning process.

When we jump straight to handing out settings, we unintentionally rob learners of the opportunity to think through the situation for themselves. A more effective—and more lasting—approach is to ask thoughtful, guiding questions instead.

Questions like:

What are you photographing?

Why are you taking the photo?

What do you want the photo to emphasize?

What camera and lens are you using?

These questions help the photographer slow down and think. They prompt a deeper understanding of the creative and technical decisions behind every image.

Some of the answers may seem obvious—or assumed—by the instructor. But that’s the problem. Those assumptions can get in the way of helping someone truly understand their own process and gear.

By asking better questions, we help photographers connect the dots between their intent, their knowledge, and their tools. And that’s where real learning happens.

True, But a Simplification?

In photography education, simplifications are everywhere.

“A wide aperture gives you shallow depth of field.”

“Raising ISO increases your camera’s sensitivity to light.”

“The digital sensor creates the image.”

All of those statements are technically true… but they’re also simplifications.

Simplifications are useful—they help beginners get started. But if we’re not careful, they become assumptions. And assumptions can prevent deeper understanding.

Personally, I like to dig deeper. I ask questions. I challenge simplifications. I tweak them, reframe them, and sometimes throw them out altogether.

For example, ISO doesn’t literally make your sensor more sensitive to light. It adjusts signal amplification and processing. And while a wide aperture can result in shallow depth of field, that’s only part of the story—focal length, subject distance, and sensor size also play a role.

You might call me a bit technical. That’s fair. But I’d rather teach photography as it really works, not just as we simplify it for convenience.

So I keep asking:

What does ISO actually do inside the camera?

Why does sensor size matter for depth of field?

What’s really happening when the shutter opens?

And I encourage others to ask too.

If you're curious, Canon has a great breakdown of how sensors work:

Image Sensors Explained – Canon

Simplifications are a starting point. But questions—they’re the path forward.