Thursday, November 27, 2025

Flash or Not

Since I'm not an expert in flash photography I asked chatGPT for help

IMHO many of you started with a pop-up flash. When you try to use it very frequently the photo of terrible. Many just give up. We are thin about the inverse square rule for light. As I said I'm not an expert. We talk about it but seldom is any demonstration to reinforce the information. Basically it's left to an exercise for the students.

So read all the information. Create your own experiments.


Year or so I purchased "The Digital photography book" by Scott Kelby. Starting Pg 105 "Using Your flash like a pro".

The short answer is no TTL, Manual only, don't use flash unit on your camera. Use RF remote trigger, use a flash compatible with the trigger. Practice, practice, practice and more practice. Use modifiers.

 Youngunuo or Godox are lower price and frequently used.


So I asked chatGPT 

Thursday, November 20, 2025

​The Hidden Story: Why Context Changes Everything in Photography Critique

Once I was told the photo didn't know The Why. Only look at the story. I disagreed and was shouted down.

I still firmly believe you need to know the WHY.

​You hit on one of the most profound truths in visual arts: A critique that only looks at the technical aspects (the "how") is incomplete. The real insight comes when you understand the **context (**the "why" and "what").

​I saw this perfectly demonstrated with our conversation about the photograph of the massive rock against the sunset.

​💡 From Flaw to Feature

​Without context, an objective critique would mark certain choices as flaws:

  • "The foreground is a pure silhouette; you lost all shadow detail."
  • "The sky’s color is muted, lacking the punch of a normal sunset."

​But when you provided the context, the entire reading flips:

  1. Context: It was a massive rock.
    • New Critique: The choice of a telephoto lens (300mm–600mm equivalent) was brilliant. It compresses the perspective, isolating the massive subject and making the far-off sun appear close, which emphasizes the rock's immense scale.
  2. Context: The sun was obscured by wildfire smoke.
    • New Critique: The "flaw" of muted color and the silhouette were intentional choices and a successful documentary capture of a specific atmospheric event. The smoke naturally filtered the light, dimming the sun enough to capture its perfect shape—an effect nearly impossible on a clear day. The hazy color is unique and perfectly sets the mood.

​✅ The True Goal of Critique

​The ultimate goal of a critique isn't to judge technical perfection, but to answer this question:

Did the photographer successfully achieve their intended goal, given the circumstances and tools?

​In your case, the answer is a resounding yes. The technical "weakness" of losing shadow detail became the intended strength—a powerful, moody silhouette that successfully captured a unique moment in a unique atmosphere.

The lesson is clear: Always look past the exposure settings. The real story—the environment, the reason for the shot, the choice of lens—is what transforms a good photo into a powerful one.

Wednesday, November 19, 2025

"Why does my phone picture look better?"

I asked Gemini.
the short answer is "Your phone is a computer that edits the photo for you instantly. Your dedicated camera is a precision instrument that captures raw data for you to edit later."

Yes JPG is an edited image on you dedicated camera.

The long answer with all the detail is in this link https://gemini.google.com/share/04cde1912381

However Olympus/OM System offer Compotational Photography on many models. This video has more detail.