Saturday, June 27, 2026

​The Photography Absolutes: Why "Guides" Trump "Rules" Every Time


Pressing the shutter release is the simple part. The rest takes time, knowledge, and experience.
​Most everything you read, the videos you watch, or the workshops you attend suggest doing one specific thing to suddenly become a better photographer. They pitch it like a silver bullet. But let me clear something up right now: there are no absolutes in photography—only guides.
​To actually improve your photography, you need to do two things: take photos, and critically analyze your results.
​If I had to name the only true absolutes, they would be composition, focus, and what instructor Matt Kloskowski calls "The Why." Why did you take the photo in the first place? Everything else is a variable. Yes, there are "rules" for composition, but the real skill is knowing which one applies to your specific situation.
​Let’s look at a few of these so-called photography rules and unpack the "buts" that the pundits always seem to leave out.
​Aperture Priority for landscape, but...
​If there is anything moving in your frame—or if things might move because of the wind or people—you have to consider your shutter speed.
​Assuming a fixed ISO, your camera is going to create a "proper" exposure based on your other settings (like your Metering mode, White Balance, and Picture Profile). To accomplish that exposure, the camera will automatically adjust the Shutter Speed (SS). But remember the general guideline for a sharp, proper handheld shot: 1/\text{focal length}. If you’re shooting at 50mm, you need to be at least at 1/50s. If Aperture Priority lets the shutter drop below that on a windy day, your sharp landscape is gone.
​Shutter Priority for motion, but...
​Similarly, if you lock in your shutter speed, the camera will automatically adjust the aperture to balance the exposure.
​Here's the catch: your photo might end up soft at the extremes of your scene. Imagine you're shooting a landscape on a windy day. You want the foreground, middle ground, and background free of blur, so you dial in 1/600s. Your camera analyzes the scene and determines the proper aperture for that speed is f/4.0. Is everything from front to back acceptably sharp at f/4.0? Maybe, maybe not.
​Low ISO for a cleaner photo, but...
​Back in the day—actually, not even that long ago—many preached that you must "always use ISO 100."
​Modern camera sensors and processing software have come an incredibly long way. Yes, ISO 100 is technically cleaner with less noise than ISO 12800. However, my humble opinion is this: get the shot. Ensure it's well-exposed, focused, and acceptably sharp. Let your camera sensor or your noise-reduction software handle the noise later. A noisy image can be saved; a blurry, missed shot cannot.
​Never use AUTO, but...
​Consider using AUTO as a quick guide to check what settings the camera thinks are appropriate, or when you need to hand your camera to someone else to snap a photo of you. Frequently, the resulting photo is perfectly acceptable. It has its place.
​Use JPEG, but...
​JPEG is fine when you don't plan on doing much post-processing, or if you need to immediately post or share the images with others. Just remember that a JPEG is like a tightly wrapped deli ham sandwich. You can unwrap it and add some condiments, but at the end of the day, it is still a ham sandwich. You can't change its core structure.
​Use RAW, but...
​On the other hand, a RAW file might look like a plain ham sandwich on your camera’s LCD screen. But because it holds all the data, you can use post-processing to turn it into a toasted turkey and ham sandwich with all the fixings. The choice of flexibility is yours.
​Fast shutter speed to eliminate motion blur, but...
​Is that actually what you want? Slowing things down is an artistic choice. Do you want to show the passage of time and motion via creative blur, or do you want to completely freeze an arrow or a bird in flight? Don't let a rule choose your artistic intent for you.
​Aperture controls Depth of Field (DoF), but...
​Yes, a large aperture (a small f-number) yields a shallow DoF. However, there are several other variables in play that dictate what is "acceptably sharp" between the nearest and farthest objects in a photo.
​Your sensor size, the distance between the camera and the subject, the distance from the subject to the background, and your focal length all play massive roles. Often, those variables are far more important than the aperture setting itself. If you want to see the physics of this in action, go spend some time playing with an online DoF simulator.
​Use Evaluative Metering, but...
​All consumer cameras are factory-set to evaluate the light reaching the sensor and average the brightest and darkest areas out to an 18% gray. Remember that the other metering modes—center-weighted and spot—do the exact same thing; they just measure the 18% gray of that specific, localized area. You have to know how the camera is thinking to override it when the scene demands it.
​Use Scene Modes, but...
​Use them as a loose guide when you're starting out. Once you have traveled further down the photography path, you will seldom use them. They ultimately become nothing more than talking points.
​Full Frame or Crop is best, but...
​Yes, Full Frame has clear advantages over smaller sensor sizes in certain conditions. But when you view an image, is the glass half full or half empty? You need to evaluate your unique workflow, lenses, and needs to make your own decision.
​Lighting...
​Back, front, side, shadow, harsh, soft, golden hour, blue hour... You need to learn what these qualities of light are and when to use them. Sometimes, you just have to deal with the exact light you are handed. When that happens, use your feet. Walk around the scene to see what angle of light works best for your photo.
​"A new camera will improve my photography"
​No, it will not. If you take bad photos with your current gear, brand-new equipment will still take bad photos.
​New gear might be physically easier for you to hold, it might assist your eyes with better Auto Focus tracking, and it might provide other features you desire—but it will not magically make a bad composition better. Learn your current camera to the absolute max before you blame the silicon inside it.
​The Takeaway
​There is no single item, setting, or piece of gear that magically makes you a better photographer. It is the combination of all the items above, and more.
​But in my opinion, it all starts with knowing your camera. Which button does what? Which menu item changes that specific behavior? If you don't know your gear inside and out, you will never be able to utilize it to its fullest potential. This applies to the simplest Point and Shoot, a cell phone camera, or the latest whiz-bang mirrorless body.
​To paraphrase President Kennedy's famous quote: We choose to go to the Moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard.
​Let's look at it this way: We choose to become better photographers not because it is easy, but because it is hard. And you only get better by taking photos and analyzing your results. Now get out there and shoot.

"Fill the Frame" Maybe not.

Why “Fill the Frame” is Misleading: The Hidden Clash Between Sensors and Print Ratios
Ask any seasoned photographer for a quick rule to improve your compositions, and nine times out of ten you’ll hear the golden phrase: “Fill the frame.” The underlying philosophy is simple and sound—eliminate distractions, emphasize your subject, and maximize the resolution of your camera's sensor by getting close or zooming in. It is passed down like a foundational law of photography.
However, when it comes to the practical reality of delivering a final product, blindly following this advice can completely ruin an otherwise perfect composition. The phrase “Fill the frame” is fundamentally misleading because it ignores a critical math problem: your camera sensor’s shape rarely matches the shape of the paper you are printing on.
The Math Behind the Sensor
Modern digital cameras are built around standardized aspect ratios. If you shoot with a full-frame or APS-C mirrorless or DSLR camera, your sensor features a 3:2 aspect ratio. For every three units of width, there are two units of height. This ratio is a structural legacy of standard 35mm film.
On the other hand, if you shoot with a Micro Four Thirds system, a medium format camera, or many smartphones, your sensor likely captures images in a 4:3 aspect ratio, which is significantly squarer.
The Print Ratio Dilemma
The conflict begins the moment you move from the digital screen to a physical print. Fine art paper, canvas wraps, and standard photo frames do not natively conform to a single standard. Instead, print sizes span a messy array of completely different aspect ratios.
If you take an image shot on a standard 3:2 sensor and decide to print a classic 8×10 inch portrait, you are attempting to fit a 3:2 image into a 5:4 container. The math simply doesn’t work without cropping.

Why Did I transition back to LrC?

Because of my 20gb space on my Photography Plan. And because I use the ecosystem. Then there was classes at the Lightroom Virtual Summit, LVS26.

One was "Next Level Importing" by Jared Platt. In 2021 I attended  "Sharing Your Work from Lightroom"
by Jared. That class taught me Adobe Lightroom was not just an editing program but an ecosystem.
 For I drifted from that when Lightroom introduced the Local tab in Lightroom CC, now called Lightroom Desktop. I was seduced by not worrying about the damn Catalog. I reviewed the pros and cons and decided what I was giving up wasn't that much.

Now after the the class at LVS26 I gave up to much. Shared Collections map to Albums in the cloud. Shared Collections don't count on my 20GB plan. From 2021 I can and share my work in any version of Lightroom.

That's enough for me. However YMMV, Your Milage May Vary.

Oh, don't forget about the Portfolio.

Don't Chimp! Is that a myth?

Beyond the "Chimping" Myth: Why 1:1 Pixel Zoom is Your Best Field Tool
​We’ve all heard the old photography rule whispered with a bit of a sneer: "Don't chimp."
​For years, street photographers and purists have warned against staring at the back of your LCD screen after every shot. And to be fair, if you are missing the next action sequence because you are admiring the photo you just took, they have a point.
​But out in the field—whether you are waiting for the perfect wildlife alignment, capturing a landscape in changing light, or working on macro details—your LCD isn’t just a digital picture frame. It is a precision diagnostic tool.
​If you know how to read it, there is one specific setting on your screen that can save you from a heartbreaking surprise when you finally load your RAW files into Lightroom: The 1:1 Pixel View.
​The Magic Threshold (100% Zoom)
​When you turn the dial to zoom into an image on your camera, you are usually just guessing how far to go. But every camera has a specific mathematical threshold where the physical pixels on your LCD screen perfectly match the pixels in your image file.
​On some bodies, this displays as a 1x1 marker on the screen (often hit at exactly 5x magnification). On others, it’s called Actual Size, Focus Check, or 100% View.
​Why does this specific number matter so much?
​Below 1:1: Your camera is discarding pixel data to compress the image onto the small screen. You can see the composition, but you cannot accurately judge micro-sharpness.
​Above 1:1: Your camera is digitally stretching the image. It will start to look soft and pixelated on the screen, even if the file itself is absolutely tack-sharp.
​At 1:1: You are seeing the unvarnished truth of your file. No interpolation, no digital stretching. Just pure, pixel-to-pixel accuracy.
​3 Reasons Pure "1:1 Chimping" Saves the Day
​Using a dedicated button or a specific zoom level to check your 1:1 view takes less than three seconds, but it solves three massive field problems that a standard glance at the LCD will miss completely.
​1. The "Small Screen" Illusion
​A 3-inch LCD screen makes almost everything look sharp. Because the image is shrunk down so small, minor motion blur, slight camera shake, or a missed focus point by just a fraction of an inch are completely invisible to the naked eye. You only notice them when you get home, blow the image up on a 27-inch monitor, and realize your best shot of the day is soft. Checking 1:1 in the field eliminates the guesswork.
​2. Spotting Micro-Movement
​If you are shooting with long telephoto lenses or working in windy conditions, micro-vibrations are your worst enemy. Even with excellent image stabilization, a sudden gust can introduce just enough blur to ruin fine details like bird feathers or distant foliage. A quick 1:1 check lets you know if you need to bump up your shutter speed or wait for the wind to die down before the subject moves on.
​3. Verifying Critical Focus Planes
​When depth of field is razor-thin—like in macro photography or when using wide apertures—the plane of critical focus is minuscule. Did the autofocus square lock onto the eye of the subject, or did it accidentally grab the beak or a leaf just in front of it? A 1:1 view centered on your focus point gives you instant confirmation so you can adjust and reshoot immediately.
​The Field Shortcut: Check your camera's custom menu. Most brands allow you to program a single button (like the center click of a joystick, an OK button, or an AF-ON button) to instantly jump straight to 1:1 view centered on the active focus point, and then toggle back with a second click.
​The Takeaway
​Don't let the anti-chimping crowd keep you from using the tools built into your camera. Checking your images isn't about vanity; it's about quality control.
​The next time you are out shooting a critical sequence, take three seconds to zoom in to that 1x1 or 100% mark. Confirming your sharpness at the pixel level before you pack up your gear is the ultimate insurance policy for your photography.
​What about you? Do you have a dedicated shortcut button set up on your camera body for an instant focus check, or do you scroll through the zoom increments manually? Let me know in the comments below!

Monday, June 8, 2026

Plan A Shoot

In northern Vermont there is a lighthouse on private property with no access.
I want to photograph it. Where, when can I create a photo?

I went to Google maps to locate the lighthouse. Where can I find a clear view? Oh, maybe on the other side of the lake. But that's a mile away! Could that work? It's a clear view, I think, over water. Will my 75-300mm telephoto with the camera 2x crop be ok? Yes the 600mm equivalent would be fine.

Now When to take the image? The Photopills app will answer that question. Use the sun and moon overlays with path overlay. Put the red pin on the lighthouse. Enable the black pin and move it to overlap the red pin. Now tap the desired shooting position.
Now since the sun is almost as furthest north and the solstice is approaching I new in 2 or 3 months the sunset would light the lighthouse.
So for my photo would be late September. Move the timeline and see if it works.  Yes and bonus the moonrise would compliment the image. Double bonus is that distance the moon will appear gigantic.

What's the weather? That's the crap shoot.



Tuesday, June 2, 2026

Lightroom’s HDR Mode: The New Photography Scam

Lightroom’s HDR Mode: The New Photography Scam

​Every time you turn around, the online photography pundits are screaming about some new "must-use" feature. The latest bandwagon they’re all jumping on is Lightroom’s HDR editing mode. They’ll tell you it's a revolutionary creative tool that makes your photos look incredibly vibrant and dramatic.

​Let me save you some time and frustration: It’s a total scam job.

​Don't mistake this for the old HDR technique of blending multiple bracketed exposures together to get detail in the shadows and sky. This new "Lightroom HDR" isn’t a photography tool at all—it’s a display hardware gimmick.

​The Nit-Picky Reality
​When you toggle that HDR button, you aren't fixing your raw file. You are just telling Lightroom to bypass the standard brightness limits of old monitors and blast your eyes with the maximum power of modern, high-end screens.
​Brightness on screens is measured in nits (a unit of light intensity). Older monitors max out around 100 nits. Modern OLED screens can crank short bursts up to 1,000 nits or more. Lightroom HDR just lets your screen use that extra hardware headroom.
​It looks blindingly beautiful on your expensive screen.

But here is why it’s a scam for practical photographers:

​The Social Media Meat Grinder: The second you upload that 1,000-nit masterpiece to Facebook or Instagram, their servers instantly crush it. They strip out the special metadata that tells screens to boost the brightness, and they force the image back down into standard sRGB. Your vibrant edit instantly looks flat, muddy, and dull on everyone else's phone

​Prints Don't Have Power Cords: 
A monitor generates its own light. A print—whether it is on fine-art paper, modern aluminum, or acrylic glass—is reflective media. It doesn't plug into a wall outlet to glow. It can only reflect the light hitting it from the room. You physically cannot print "nits."

​Larry's Practical Takeaway

​If you edit your files in Lightroom’s HDR mode, you are effectively locking your photo inside your own monitor. You can't share it properly on the internet, and you can't print it on a piece of metal to hang on your wall.
​Stop listening to the pundits who are hypnotized by shiny new sliders. Stick to standard editing, preserve real-world values, and don't waste your time editing for a phantom audience that will never see what you see.