Showing posts with label DOF. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DOF. Show all posts

Saturday, May 10, 2025

Why "Use a Wide Aperture for Shallow Depth of Field" Isn’t the Whole Truth

Why "Use a Wide Aperture for Shallow Depth of Field" Isn’t the Whole Truth

Photography instructors often teach that a wide aperture (like f/2.8 or f/1.8) creates shallow depth of field—those dreamy blurred backgrounds. That’s true… but it’s only part of the story. And for many photographers, especially those using Micro Four Thirds or phones, it can lead to confusion.

Let’s break it down.

What Really Controls Depth of Field?

Depth of field (DoF) is influenced by four key factors:

1. Aperture (f-number) – Wider = shallower DoF. Narrower = deeper DoF.


2. Focal Length – Longer lenses isolate subjects more (e.g., 85mm vs. 25mm).


3. Distance to Subject – Closer focus means shallower DoF.


4. Sensor Size – Bigger sensors give shallower DoF at the same framing and aperture.



Why It Matters

If you're using a phone with a fast f/1.5 lens, you might wonder:

> “Why isn’t my background blurry?”



It’s because your phone’s sensor is tiny, and its lens is ultra-wide. Even at f/1.5, almost everything stays in focus due to optical physics.

If you're using a Micro Four Thirds camera, you might notice that f/2.8 doesn’t blur backgrounds as much as a full-frame camera. That’s because your sensor is smaller—so you get more depth of field at a given aperture and framing.

What Instructors Should Say

Instead of just “use a wide aperture,” instructors should teach:

> “To control depth of field, consider aperture, focal length, distance, and sensor size together. A wide aperture helps—but only in context.”



That’s real instruction.

A Practical Example

Phone camera: 4mm f/1.5 lens = almost everything in focus

MFT camera: 25mm f/1.8 lens = some blur, more control

Full-frame: 85mm f/1.8 lens = rich background blur, even at a distance


Same f-number, totally different results.


---

Bottom line: You deserve instructors who explain, not just prescribe. Photography is part science and part art—but learning works best when we teach the science clearly.



Sunday, December 1, 2024

Choose Your Aperture

In a recent sippet from The Grid ( about 30inutes in) got me thinking how to choose the Aperture.

Usually I desk check to consider the Aperture I'll use considering my expectation of the scene. I use Photopills app on my phone. You may use this web version

As an example I wanted to that light trails of lighted Disc Golf. I wanted to use my 12mm f/2.0 lens. Since there is no way I could focus on the dark what could I do?

I used Photopills DoF and setup my camera type. f/2.0 then estimated the subject distance to the camera of 50 ft.

That didn't work since the near distance was 49.+ ft. So what if the lighted Disc lands say 10ft from my camera? Using a subject of 20 feet gives me a near Dof  about 9ft and a far of infinity.

The result yes but some of the discs landed out of the Depth of field in front so they are not sharp.

To me it's all about "acceptable" sharpness. 

UPDATE(20241126) - Hyperfocal distance 

Of course YMMV.

Friday, September 6, 2024

My DoF Rant

I've been somewhat disgusted with the pundents that give simple solutions to complex photography subjects.

For what's it worth. It isn't that simple. Many articles and videos are just click bait. A simple way to improve your photography.

My favorite piss off issue is use a large Aperture to have a small DoF. While not incorrect it doesn't tell the complete story.


In stoppers article dated July 27 2024 it address DoF here.

I've discussed this subject over the years here.

And here https://youtu.be/vaK6bHiD4qU?si=kdco7WJguigFD7Yj

Zone Focus

Many articles discussed sharpness. Yes it's important and many may will disagree with me. 

But do you need to track the eye and spend money to purchase new cameras, "gun site" accessories? IMHO No.

Consider zone focus. 

For me with moving subjects I use Photopills DoF pill to decide will the subject be in focus.

When I'm using my 75-300mm glass wide open at f/6.7 and estimated distance of 100ft my DoF is over than 6 feet. That's enough for me to capture many subjects with acceptable sharpness. At f/8.0 DoF is 8 ft. That works for me. YMMV.

For those not M43 shooters need to consider the sensor size. Using a full frame at 600mm it would cut the DoF about half.

 DoF Simulator

Saturday, August 19, 2023

DoF, Depth of Field

Previously I wrote on DoF and wanted to follow up. So I asked Bard for help.  

Basically what many don't tell you is that there are 4 major factors that influence DoF. 
  • Aperture
  • Focal Length
  • Distance between camera, subject and background
  • Sensor size
Read the links above for detail and use DoF Simulator setting your camera and lens to get an idea of your DoF


Thursday, June 16, 2022

I don't always us Manual Mode But when I Do

 I don't always us Manual Mode But when I Do I'm usually photographing things with sudden movement potential and I want total control of both the Aperture and Shutter speed.  Also I'm usually using Auto ISO for most of my photography since my camera tops out at 6400 in auto ISO which is the native hi ISO.  I can manually set my ISO as high as 25600.


The Auto ISO settings on my camera have a "Auto" setting for Shutter Speed, S/S, and I have been unable to learn what "Auto" really means.


To day we were at the Kentucky Train Museum in New Haven.  The museum has a nice model train setting and I decided to try a few pictures. I did not bring a flash attachment and my camera does not have a popup flash. So it was native light.


I choose these settings; f/8.0, Aperture Priority and Auto ISO.  The photos of stationary items had ISO of 6400 and S/S as low as 1/4 second. The stabilization did a fantastic job but at below of about 1/20s there is motion blur.


Since there are models running I thought I would try to capture a couple. That meant I needed a faster S/S. ISO to the rescue. I went to the top 25600. But the noise the noise. Yep but deal with it.  I wanted the shot. Get the shot, "Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead".


After a couple of test shots I set the focal length to 56mm. In Aperture of f/8.0 the shutter speed was 1/60s. Good but not great. I used Lighroom Classic to set the exposure to where I was satisfied. Then in to Topaz to clean up the noise and sharpness. 

f/8.0, 1/60s, ISO 25600, 56mm focal length

Topaz DeNoise AI + Sharpen AI

After review I found that the Aperture of f/8.0 was soft on the top and bottom edges. The focus point was in the middle of the frame. Using PhotoPills DoF pill showed that I estimate the DoF with my lens settings to be 2 feet or less.  If I had used f/16.0 the S/S would have been 1/30s to maintain the same exposure.


Yes it is still noisy and soft but I got the shot.







Thursday, August 20, 2020

Do you shoot wide open?

Like many things in photography, it depends. 

As in I've stated before when the question is, what settings do I use? It depends.

What photographic effect are you attempting to achieve? 

This article may help