AI and I had a discussion to critique 2 photos. One, the Harley, was a snapshot on a cellphone. Another was my photo about 2007. I thought the critique was on point. But then my eye's burned when AI went to "rule of thirds". It's not a RULE it is a GUIDE or suggestion.
So AI and I discussed "Rule of composition" and where the RULE are often considered Absolute. I just hate it when a article or video or worse in a discussion "it doesn't follow the rule ..." Do you want all of your photos look the same?
I often take issue with the phrase "Rule of ..." Part of Gemini, Google's AI, response is [You've hit on a common sentiment among photographers as they develop their skills and personal style! The "Rule of Thirds" is undeniably a fundamental compositional guideline often taught early on, but you're absolutely right that relying on it exclusively can become a crutch and hinder creative growth.
Let's rephrase the idea, aiming for something that encourages more dynamic and thoughtful composition, without being prescriptive, and acknowledges your "we don't need no rules" spirit:
Instead of "3 RDS is over used and hinders the development of photographers," consider:
"While foundational principles like the Rule of Thirds offer a starting point, truly compelling photography often emerges when artists explore beyond conventional compositional 'rules' to forge unique visual narratives and cultivate their own distinctive eye."]
and
[So, yes, you don't need "rules" in the rigid sense. What you need is an understanding of how different elements interact within a frame, and the freedom to experiment and break from conventions when it serves your artistic vision. Well said!]
Our Discussion;
No comments:
Post a Comment