Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Let's Talk About Metering Modes


What metering modes are available on your camera?

Which one do you usually use, and why?

More importantly, have you taken the time to learn how each metering mode evaluates a scene and how that affects your exposure?

Here's something to try:

Go back through some of your past photographs that didn't turn out as you expected.

Look at the lighting and the exposure. Would a different metering mode have helped? Why or why not?

Remember, the goal isn't simply to know what metering modes your camera offers. It's to understand what they do, when they might be useful, and how they affect your photographic decisions.

Learning how your camera works gives you another tool in your problem-solving toolbox.

Comments and experiences are welcome. Let's have a discussion!he Modes

What metering modes are available on your camera?

Which one do you usually use, and why?

More importantly, have you taken the time to learn how each metering mode evaluates a scene and how that affects your exposure?

Here's something to try:

Go back through some of your past photographs that didn't turn out as you expected.

Look at the lighting and the exposure. Would a different metering mode have helped? Why or why not?

Remember, the goal isn't simply to know what metering modes your camera offers. It's to understand what they do, when they might be useful, and how they affect your photographic decisions.

Learning how your camera works gives you another tool in your problem-solving toolbox.

Comments and experiences are welcome. Let's have a discussion!

My Skool Community

I have a Skool community with a named  Photography & OM-D/OM System create a free Skool account and join me there.

Although this is the URL the name has been changed to Practical Photography Larry 


3 AI Model. 3 Different Results

Steve Kickert created a YouTube video on his channel where discuss AI and how he uses it.

Watching that video I wondered if I use the same prompt are they different?  All use Large Language Models, LLM, different implations.   Following are the prompts and their responses.

"Compare and contrast the free Gemini, chatgpt and Claude AI. rate them" 

"at the celery fields in Sarasota Florida offer locations of photos birds using my camera other than RRBW. Also recommended lens I currently have, times of day between October 2016 and April 2027. also consider the sun direction"



No one is incorrect. The responses vary largely.

Do your own tests with your promptes.



What’s the Interest

When you’re scrolling social media or judging a photo contest, what actually stops you?


Is it #1?

  • “Cropping in slightly can help as the coma or distortion effect isn't an issue in the center.”

  • “...didn't follow the rule of thirds.”

  • “...it's not tack sharp at 200%.”

Or is it #2?

  • A clear center of interest

  • Strong contrast

  • A genuine emotional spark


How long before you move on to the next photo? From my research, the average is less than 2 seconds.


Whether it's a casual scroller or a judge looking at a contest grid, both make that split-second decision based on #2. 


They stop for immediate visual impact—not pixel-peeping.


What makes you pause?



It’s Not That Simple: Why There Are No Absolutes in Photography

It’s Not That Simple: Why There Are No Absolutes in Photography

Friday, July 7, 2023 Rewrite in 2025 Dec. 23, rewrite on July 14 2026

It’s Not That Simple: Why There Are No Absolutes in Photography

​Pressing the shutter button is the easy part. Everything else—the knowledge, the timing, the experience, and the physical effort—is where the real work happens.
​Most of what you read, watch, or hear in modern workshops suggests a "do this to get a perfect image" approach. But in photography, there are no absolutes. There are only guides. To truly improve, you have to step away from the tutorials, get out into the field, take the shots, and honestly analyze your results.
​If I had to name the only true "absolutes," they would be composition, focus, and what Matt Kloskowski calls "The Why." Why did you take the photo in the first place?
​Beyond that, everything is a compromise. You are balancing a puzzle of technical, artistic, and emotional variables. The moment you treat a rule as an absolute law, it stops being a guide and becomes a pair of training wheels you've forgotten to take off.
​Here is why the most common "rules" of photography always come with a giant "BUT..."

​Part 1: The "Buts" of Camera Settings
​Every setting you dial into your camera is a negotiation. To gain one thing, you must give up another.
​"Use Aperture Priority for landscapes..."
​BUT if anything in your frame is moving—the wind in the trees, rushing water, or clouds in the sky—you must consider shutter speed. If your ISO is fixed, your camera will chase a "proper" exposure by dropping your shutter speed. If it drops too low, you lose that critical sharpness.
​A good handheld rule of thumb: Keep your shutter speed at least 1 / \text{focal length} to avoid camera shake.
​"Use Shutter Priority to freeze motion..."
​BUT remember that your camera will aggressively adjust the aperture to compensate for that speed. If you are shooting a landscape at 1/600\text{s} on a windy day, your camera might open up to f/4. Is your background still in focus? Maybe, maybe not. You've solved one problem only to create another.
​"Use a low ISO for a clean photo..."
​BUT don't be afraid of the dark. Modern sensors are incredibly powerful, and modern software handles noise beautifully. I would hands-down prefer a sharp, well-exposed shot with a bit of noise over a "clean" shot that is completely blurry because the ISO was set too low. Get the shot first; clean it up later.
​"Never use AUTO..."
​BUT AUTO is a fantastic tool to find a quick exposure baseline when you're struggling in tricky light, or when you're handing your camera to a friend to snap a quick photo of you. The camera doesn't care about your pride, and the result is often perfectly acceptable.
​"Use JPEG..."
​BUT remember that a JPEG is like a wrapped deli ham sandwich. You can unwrap it and add some mustard, but it’s always going to be a ham sandwich. It is perfectly fine for an immediate social media post, but your editing options down the line are severely limited.
​"Use RAW..."
​BUT know that RAW files will look flat and uninspiring on your LCD screen. The magic is entirely in the post-processing—where you get to take those raw ingredients and turn that basic ham sandwich into a toasted turkey and ham panini. RAW isn't a finished photo; it's the raw data to make one.
​"Use a fast shutter speed to stop blur..."
​BUT is that actually what you want? Photography is an artistic choice. Do you want to freeze a bird in flight like a static museum specimen, or do you want to show the beautiful, dynamic motion of its wings through a touch of intentional blur?
​"Aperture controls Depth of Field (DoF)..."
​BUT it is far from the only factor. Your sensor size, your physical distance from the subject, and your focal length often dictate your depth of field far more than your lens's f-stop.
​"Use Evaluative/Matrix Metering..."
​BUT remember that your camera is a computer trying to turn your entire world into 18% middle gray. Whether you use evaluative, center-weighted, or spot metering, the camera is just performing math to find that average gray. You have to decide if that gray matches the mood you actually want to convey.

​Part 2: The "Buts" of Field Craft
​You can master every camera dial in the world, but editing is a topic for another day. Before you ever sit down at a computer, you have to get the image in the camera. That is where field craft comes in—the physical effort, preparation, and quiet patience that happens before you press the shutter.

​"Just use a long telephoto lens to get closer..."
​BUT a longer lens is no substitute for patience and positioning. Field craft is about understanding your subject—whether it's the flight pattern of a bird, the trajectory of a rocket, or the angle of the sun hitting a building. If you don't know how your subject behaves or how the environment moves, a massive lens will only help you take high-resolution photos of a missed alignment. Stealth, patience, and anticipating the moment will always out-perform focal length.
​"Rely on the lens zoom to frame your shot..."
​BUT zooming with your fingers on the glass is lazy. True composition happens with your feet. Moving just six inches to the left, or dropping your tripod a foot lower to the ground, can completely change how a foreground element interacts with the background. Field craft means physically working the scene, finding the angles, and choosing the exact spot where the elements of the puzzle lock together.
​"Use a sturdy tripod for everything..."
​BUT sometimes a tripod is just an anchor that locks you in place and makes you rigid. If you are tracking fast, unpredictable wildlife or reacting to rapid changes in the field, hand-holding your camera or using a monopod might be the exact compromise you need to stay fluid and mobile. The best support system is the one that allows you to react to the scene, not the one that keeps you trapped in one spot.
​"Just show up and start shooting..."
​BUT the best shots are won before you even pack your gear. Field craft is studying the weather, mapping the terrain, calculating where the light will fall, and setting up your physical environment days or weeks in advance. The actual photo is just the final 1% of a long-term plan.

​Part 3: The Ultimate Myth
​"A new camera will improve my photography..."
​NO, it won’t. If you are taking bad photos now, a more expensive camera will just take incredibly high-resolution bad photos. New gear might offer faster autofocus or cooler menu systems, but it cannot make you a better artist. Learn your current gear to its absolute physical limits before you blame the tool.
​The Bottom Line
​There is no single "secret" to being a better photographer. It is a continuous, messy puzzle of compromising variables.
​Whether you are shooting on a cell phone or a dedicated mirrorless body, you need to know your tool so well that you can adjust it without looking. If you have to stop and think about which button does what, you aren't looking at the light—you're looking at a machine.
​To paraphrase President Kennedy: We choose to become better photographers not because it is easy, but because it is hard.

Photo a Large Moon

There is an entry I me my discord server that may be of interest 

The Great Sharpness Lie (And Why Your Prints Don't Care)

The Great Sharpness Lie (And Why Your Prints Don't Care)

Go to any online photography forum or gear review site, and you’ll see the exact same obsession: people zooming in to 400% on a digital monitor, hyper-ventilating over a slightly soft corner, or arguing that you must stop down one full stop to hit your lens’s clinical "sweet spot."
I’m here to tell you that the obsession with hyper-sharpness is a trap. It’s a distraction from what actually makes an image great, and frankly, it's overrated.
When you step away from the glowing screen and look at how photography works in the real world, the technical argument for sacrificing physical light just to chase micro-sharpness completely falls apart.
Here is why the "sharpness lie" is ruining your peace of mind—and why you should stop worrying about it.
1. The Monitor Trap vs. Normal Viewing Distance
We’ve been conditioned to judge our work from six inches away from a high-resolution LED panel. But nobody looks at art that way.
At a normal viewing distance—whether an image is framed on a wall or laid out in a book—the human eye physically cannot resolve the microscopic difference between a "tack-sharp" shot taken at a stopped-down aperture and a slightly softer shot taken wide open.
Your viewer doesn't care about the resolving power of your glass in the extreme corners. They notice impact, emotion, light, and gesture. If a photo makes you feel something, a tiny bit of optical softness isn’t going to ruin it. If a photo is boring, making it hyper-sharp just makes it a sharp, boring photo.
2. Print: The Great Equalizer
The ultimate proof that sharpness is overrated happens the moment you transfer your work from the digital screen to the physical world. The printing process inherently changes the nature of image detail—and it destroys the sharpness issue entirely.
When ink hits paper, a beautiful, natural transformation occurs:
Dot Gain (Ink Bleed): Microscopic droplets of ink hit the paper and naturally spread into the fibers. This tiny, organic bleed instantly smooths out the harsh, clinical, jagged edges of digital pixels.
Paper Texture: Whether you print on a heavy matte, a fine-art rag, or a textured canvas, the physical medium breaks up pixel-level micro-detail. The paper itself becomes part of the image structure, adding a painterly depth that no digital screen can replicate.
Reflected Light: You are no longer looking at light blasting directly into your eyes from pixels. You are looking at light reflecting off a surface. This creates smoother tonal transitions and naturally masks minor optical imperfections.
The Real Trade-Off
Think about the physics of capture. If you stop down your lens by a stop just to chase a theoretical "sweet spot" on a chart, you are cutting the physical amount of light hitting your sensor exactly in half.
To get that brightness back, you either have to crank your ISO at capture or drag the exposure slider up in post-processing. Both moves force a digital multiplier onto your data, amplifying the electronic noise floor and adding ugly shadow grain.
Why sacrifice clean, physical photons and risk digital noise just to fix a "softness" that disappears the second the image is printed?
The Bottom Line
Keep the light. Shoot wide open if the moment or the exposure demands it. Stop pixel-peeping at 400% on a monitor, and start judging your work by how it feels when it's printed, held in your hands, or viewed from a reasonable distance.
A technically "imperfect" image with soul will always beat a sterile, hyper-sharp test chart.